The beginning of the 20th century was marked by a new approach to grammar suggested by linguists like Ferdinand de Saussure and American linguists such as Franz Boas, Edward Sapir and Leonard Bloomfield. This school of linguistics is called Structuralism. It arose as a reaction against the approach of the traditional grammarians of the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries.

An essential factor in the development of American structural linguistics was the influence of behaviouristic psychology. The central assumption of behaviourism is that every aspect of human behaviour can be explained by indicating a certain stimulus which calls forth a certain response:

S –> R

Bloomfield, one of the prime movers of American Structuralism, was the first linguist to appeal to behaviourism to explicate his conception of the central function of language. The speech act is a linguistic substitute response, which in turn acts as a linguistic substitute stimulus on the hearer and results in a response on his part. Schematically: S –> r…s –> R (where r = verbal response and s = verbal stimulus). According to Bloomfield, “A speech act or utterance then is a special aspect of human behaviour, and the totality of utterances which can be made in a speech community constitutes the language of that speech community”.

An utterance is made up of three components: S, R and r…s. S and R are closely interrelated and constitute the content side of an utterance. By contrast, r…s, a physically manifest stretch of sound, constitute the expression side of an utterance. In principle, it is the goal of linguistics to account for the relationship between the content side and the expression side of language. To put it briefly, in human speech different sounds have different meanings. To study this coordination of certain sounds with certain meanings is to study the language.

In the analysis of the expression side of language, the linguist has at his disposal a corpus of recorded utterances. In approaching his corpus, the linguist makes the following assumptions:

    1. Utterances are tokens of an underlying system.
    2. Given a set of carefully defined procedures the underlying system can be discovered by processing the data.
    3. No constructs may appear in the grammar, which is not directly warranted by the physical data.

One of the most important concepts in structural grammar is that of ‘class of’. This being the case, structural linguistics is often referred to by transformational generative grammarians as taxonomic linguistics. The taxonomic model of linguistic description, as it developed over the years may be represented diagrammatically in roughly the following way:

The grammar has four components (or levels of analysis): phonology, morphology, morphophonemics, and syntax. Thus a structural grammar of a language is essentially an inventory of units established at the various levels of analysis and suitably classified to a set of procedurally defined classificational constructs.

During the first half of the 20th century, American linguistics was closely linked with anthropology. Anthropological linguistics reinforced the taxonomic conception of grammar. Structuralists were of the view that each language was a unique system of communication which should be studied in its terms.

The structural linguists began to study language in terms of observable and verifiable data and describe it according to the behaviour of the language as it was being used. These descriptive linguists emphasized:

    1. Spoken language is primary and writing is secondary
    2. The synchronic study of language should take precedence over its diachronic study.
    3. Language is a system of systems.

The structural linguists attempted to describe language in terms of its structure and tried to look for regularities and patterns or rules in language structure. Bloomfield envisaged that language structure was associated with phoneme as the unit of phonology and morpheme as the unit of grammar. Phonemes are the minimal distinctive sound units of language. The word tap consists of three phonemes: /t/, /æ/ and /p/. Morphemes are larger than phonemes as they consist of one or more phonemes. The word playing consists of two morphemes play and ing, whereas it consists of phonemes /p/, /l/, //, /ɪ/ and /ŋ/. So to study the structure of a sentence, a linguist must be aware of the string of phonemes or morphemes that make up the sentence.

Look at this sentence: The unlucky player played himself out.

As a string of phonemes, it is /ðɪ ʌnlʌkɪ pleɪə pleɪd hɪmself aʊt/
As a string of morphemes, the structure is The-un-luck-y-play-er-play-ed-him-self-out.

This type of approach in respect of the structure of language was based on a desire to be completely precise, empirical, logical and scientific as against the unscientific, illogical and prescriptive approach of the traditional grammarians.

Listen

Previous articleOne Word Substitutes
Next articleParagraph Features
Devika Panikar has been teaching English Language and Literature for 14 years now. She is an Assistant Professor with the Directorate of Collegiate Education under the Government of Kerala. She teaches at the Government Colleges coming under this directorate and is now posted at the Department of English, H.H. The Maharaja’s Government College for Women, Thiruvananthapuram. This website is a collection of the lecture notes that she prepared by referring various sources, for her students’ perusal. It has been compiled here for the sake of future generations.

COMMENT